*UPDATE April 12th, 2017:
Thank you to everyone who volunteered to be a peer reviewer for Access 2017. We have finalized our list of reviewers and are no longer accepting submissions.
Access 2017 is seeking peer reviewers to help select presentations for the conference. Peer reviewers will be responsible for reading Access Conference session proposals and reviewing them for selection.
Peer reviewers will be selected by the Program Committee and will ideally include a variety of individuals across disciplines including Access old-timers and newbies alike. You do not need to be attending the conference to volunteer as a peer reviewer.
The peer review process is double-blind. Those who have submitted Access Conference session proposals are welcome and encouraged to become peer reviewers as well. You won’t receive your own proposal to review. Please note that the peer reviewing activity will take place between April 6 and April 25.
To be considered as a peer reviewer, please attach your abridged CV (max. 5 pages) and provide the following information in the body of an email:
- Position and affiliation
- A few sentences that explain why you want to be a peer reviewer for Access 2017
Please submit this information to firstname.lastname@example.org by April 5, 2017.